For me, the period of time between Thanksgiving and New Year’s is usually a kind of personal sacred time. Each year I begin this five week season by making a list of all the people, events and things in the past year for which I am thankful. Then I go thru Advent with a sense of yearning, anticipation and renewed hope for a better world. Advent then culminates with the celebration of Christmas with its mixed focus on the birth of Jesus, the coming together of family, and the sharing of presents. Then a week later we welcome a new year and I write down hopes for the year to come. I began this practice nearly 40 years ago when I was in college and it has served as sort of liminal time where I move from one year to the next, from being fatigued and doubting to having a renewed hope and focus for the future.
However, this year my Thanksgiving to New Year’s sacred time has taken on a different feel. Two days before Thanksgiving the decision was announced that Officer Darrin Wilson would not be indicted in the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO. A week later a similar announcement was made regarding the officers responsible for choking and killing Eric Garner. Almost immediately demonstrations erupted around the country. Die-ins were held in select shopping malls on Black Friday. In cities from east to west groups of young people marched with hands held high signs saying “Don’t Shoot,” “I Can’t Breathe” and “Black Lives Matter.” Here in Philadelphia there have been marches that interrupted the city’s Christmas Tree lighting ceremony, a die-ins at major intersections during rush hour and following a Philadelphia Eagles game, a service of the Seven Last Words of Black people, and numerous marches throughout the city. Even larger gatherings have occurred in New York and Washington bringing attention to this issue on both a local and national scale.
While I have not participated in any of these marches or demonstrations, I have watched them closely and have been a part of numerous conversations both formal and informal. In these conversations there have been a wide range of emotions expressed from anger to guilt to confusion. Many of my white friends have wondered where and how and whether they should fit in the demonstrations. Others have wondered where the demonstrations will lead and what if any changes will come about because of them. Some media commentators have focused on the few instances of violence and have questioned whether demonstrators are “hurting their cause" by interrupting normal activities and generally causing disruption. To be sure in many ways at this point the demonstrations appear to more about expressing anger and frustration at police brutality and more generally a unjust criminal justice system, than calling for concrete specific change.
However, as I have studied the history of social movements, and particularly the Civil Rights Movement, what appears in hindsight to have been a clear, focused effort toward social change was at the time it occurred often chaotic, controversial and confusing. For that reason, I share the demonstrators’ anger and frustration, and at the same time I have hope that emotion can be channeled into concrete action for positive social change. However, if history teaches us anything, that process will be haphazard, confusing, frustrating and filled with stops and starts. Thus it will require clear leadership and perseverance over a long haul.
Coincidentally as I have been going thru my "sacred time," the demonstrations have given me a renewed appreciation for the disruptive nature of the birth of Jesus in his time. The Christmas story we hear usually focuses on a mother, father and a child born in a barn accompanied by angels and wise men. However a part of the story often overlooked is the social chaos that ensued because of his birth. According to the gospel of Matthew, when King Herod realized a child-king was being born in his midst, he ordered mass infanticide in hopes of killing his would-be adversary; the people of the land were terrorized. As a counterpoint to Herod’s action in Luke’s Gospel when Mary learns of her pregnancy, she sings a song which in part said:
God has brought down rulers from their thrones
but has lifted up the humble.
God has filled the hungry with good things,
but sent the rich away empty.
Then when the infant Jesus was presented in the temple a few days after his birth, the prophetess Anna and the prophet Simeon proclaimed the child was the harbinger of a new age..
The birth of Jesus, while at one level benign and blessed, at the same time set in motion a process of significant change. Contrary to the image of a silent blessed night, the birth of Jesus was accompanied by violence, chaos and fear, as well as hope for a better day. At the heart of the Christian story is a God who enters history for the purpose of interrupting and disrupting the status quo in order to bring hope and justice to hurting and oppressed people.
Angela Glover Blackwell, the CEO of Policy Link, an organization dedicated to promoting equitable and sustainable economic development in low income communities, grew up in St. Louis and recently spoke about the events in Ferguson over the past few weeks. Like Black people in nearby Ferguson, Glover as a child remembered being treated as a second class citizen because of her skin color. Reflecting on recent events in light of Civil Rights Movement in the 1960’s, she suggested that the demonstrations are a sign that people have hope. When people have hope and their expectations are not met, they get angry and act out. Thus, while recent events may appear on the surface to be chaotic and at times even violent, Blackwell believes they are a sign that people want better and are willing to speak up and work for it.
In the same way, the birth of Jesus was a sign of hope for his time and for ages to come. Perhaps in interrupting and disrupting our normally festive Christmas season, these demonstrations remind us that God is again breaking in to move us to work for a society where race and class are no longer the determining factor as to who is treated fairly and humanely, and who is not. They are a sign that people of faith and conscience, working together can and must fight to create a world where the lion and the lamb can lay down together and where the young black man and the white police officer can achieve reconciliation at a table of mutual respect, common concern and equitable justice.
This blog is a place for me to share my thoughts in the process of development. Since I tend to be all over the place in terms of my interests, these thoughts will roam from politics, to philosophy, to theological reflections, to books I am reading. I invite comments questions, challenges and general feedback.
Saturday, December 20, 2014
Tuesday, December 02, 2014
The Meaning of Ferguson for White Folks
Over a week has passed since the announcement was made that
Ferguson police officer Darrin Wilson would not be indicted for the killing of Michael Brown.
Over the last week there have been demonstrations in Ferguson and cities around
the country protesting the non-indictment and its relationship to police
brutality, a racially discriminatory criminal justice system and other forms of
institutional racism. Many articles, blogs and TV commentators have reported
these events and others observers have sought to analyze the meaning of these
events as they relate to the state of Black America and racism in this country.
While the St. Louis Grand Jury did not indict, the U.S. Justice Department has
initiated its own investigation into the event. Moreover, there has been a
vigorous discussion and even debate among Black Americans over how to interpret
these events. One topic that has been noticeably absent in these discussions is the meaning
of Ferguson for white folks.
On the Friday after Thanksgiving, David Brooks, the
respected NY Times columnist participated in his weekly National Public Radio discussion on the political issues of the previous week and said this about the
reaction to Ferguson:
“[President
Obama in his reaction to Ferguson has shown] the ways we're still living with
legacy of the civil rights movement - in that era - and the ways times have
changed. The civil rights movement was as clear as you get to a right versus
wrong issue as you get in domestic politics.
Now
when we talk about racial matters, we're dealing with a variety of subjects -
the legacy of racism, the problems we have with our sentencing, disappearance
of working-class jobs, family structure - and to me what's happened is that racial
issues have become embroiled in a whole series of very tricky domestic issues. And
so what was once a pretty clear right versus wrong moral cause has become a
moral cause, but much more ambiguous …” [emphasis mine]
Brooks’ comments reflects a common perception among most
White Americans that during the Civil Rights Era the issues of racial justice
were clear cut, but now it is much harder to sift out racism from other
domestic issues. Moreover implied in Brooks’ comments is the idea that in many
ways we should be past all these “racial matters.” Yet, had we been in
Montgomery in 1955 or Little Rock in 1957 or Selma in 1965, these “racial
matters” were equally entwined then as now with “domestic issues” like
economics, education, the right to vote, and the nature of culture. Looking
back the issues may have seemed to be a case of “clear right versus wrong,” but
not for the folks who lived during those events.
Yet, for many Black Americans, the issues are still clear. If
the Pew Research Center is to be believed there is a huge gap in how Blacks and
Whites interpret these events. In August of this year Pew reported that 80% of
Blacks polled thought Ferguson raised important racial issues, while only 37% of
Whites thought race had anything to do with Ferguson. For Black folks the issues are clear; it is White folks who don’t seem to see
things clearly. The gap in perception itself reveals that Whites and Blacks are
living in two Americas with two widely divergent views of the deeper meaning of
these events.
As uncomfortable as it may be, we who are White must
recognize that in many ways we are Darren published testimony before the Grand Jury Darren Wilson expressed his fear of Michael Thomas likening himself to “a five
year old holding onto Hulk Hogan.” Darren Wilson is not a small man. He is 6’4”,
and an armed police officer. Yet in his fear
he shot Michael Brown 12 times; how could not that literally be overkill? But
more to the point, if I am honest, I have to admit that I understand his fear.
Though I was raised by progressively minded parents and consider myself to be
strongly anti-racist, deep in my psyche I have absorbed the image of the scary
black man, and the irrational notion that young Black men are to be feared. A
former teacher of mine, Dr. Charles Tillman referred to white racism as a form
of mental illness; this deep fear is a clear example of how sick some of us White
folks can be, and we don’t even know it.
Wilson, and the all-white Ferguson
police force is White America. We would like to think that Officer Wilson and
events in Ferguson, are an anomaly, but they are not. In his
The political leadership of Ferguson is America, too. In a
town that is 70% Black, only one councilperson is Black, and the police force
is all White. While we have a Black president and many other political leaders
of color, when we look at the Congress, state governors and political
leadership of the nation, the percentage of White leaders far outpaces the
number of Whites in the country. And just like David Brooks, most of these
leaders just don’t get that racism is a problem. More than that, the systems in
place, be they criminal justice, education, health care, and other systems, are
designed to serve Whites more fairly than people of color. The results are
found in how much better these systems work for the average White person versus
how they work for people of color.
The point of seeing ourselves in Ferguson is not to raise
guilt or to get into a debate on the details of the case, but rather to
recognize that as Whites in the United States, we are (in most cases) the
unwitting beneficiaries of a system and a culture that provides us with
advantages and opportunities that people of other races do not enjoy. This is
not to diminish the hard work and individual success that many Whites enjoy; it
is only to say that the game is rigged and we didn’t know it.
Furthermore, if the emotions and issues raised by Ferguson
are ever to be fully addressed, we who are White must be as much a part of the
conversation as our Black counterparts. In our churches, coffee shops, dinner
tables and wherever White folks gather, we need to ask ourselves: what does
Ferguson say about White folks like us? How are we like the leaders and police
force in Ferguson? How are we like Darren Wilson? How must we and the
society we live in change, so that the Michael Browns and Trayvon Martins of
this world not only can survive, but have a fair shot at success in this
country? When we get to our deep feelings and hidden thoughts, the answers may
not be politically correct, but they will be honest.
As any therapist will tell you, healing from any mental
illness (and racism is a mental illness), begins with honesty. We White folks
need to get honest about Ferguson; it’s not just a Black problem, it’s our
problem too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)